Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 2nd September 2010

Dispute over condoms at Sudbury Christmas tree festival

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 December 2008
A dispute over whether it was right or wrong to place a box of condoms underneath a Christmas tree as part of a festival whose visitors include young children has caused a stir.
The Christmas Tree festival at St Peters in Sudbury has been held for many years and helps to generate money for charity while also allowing organisations to publicise their work.

This year a tree supported by the Fight Back Trust - a voluntary organisation which provides help and advice for people with HIV or AIDS - is part of the festival.

Volunteers, who have been helped by the group and put up the tree, were angered to find the box offering free condoms had been removed when they returned to the festival to replenish the leaflets and condoms.

One of the volunteers, who did not want to be named, said he was furious at what had happened.

"The Christmas tree is obviously based on HIV/AIDS and safe sex, and so surely parents of 'two year olds' should be there to stop their children taking the packages.

"And even if the children took them, the packages are sealed black envelopes with red ribbon images on the front and the NHS symbol.

"The children would not even know what they are, or probaly be able to open them. We did find that over half the safe sex packs had been taken by the public, before the box had been removed.

"What kind of community is this that we live in that thinks that condoms which may save people's life and prevent the spread of not only HIV/AIDS but many other diseases, and prevent unwanted teenage pregnancies, of which Britain has the highest percentage, are wrong and dirty?"

The condoms in the box have now been replaced with ribbons.

Roger Green, of Friends of St Peter's, said: "The box of condoms, labelled 'please take one', was removed prior to the Christmas Tree Festival being visited by a large number of primary school and pre school children, because we felt the box of condoms at child's height on the floor may have presented itself as attractive to young children aged three and upward' and we didn't want to cause any embarrasment to parents or teachers.

"The decision to remove the box had to be taken quickly and the intent was to return it later in the day when school parties or children coming in with their parents would not be expected.

"At present, the people from the Fightback Trust have taken away the box of condoms.

"We as the Friends of St Peter's support their aims and objectives and we would not in any way wish to have caused them any hurt or offence and would unreservedly apologise for having done so."

One visitor to the Festival, Valerie goodchild of Sudbury, said: "The organisers, were absolutely right to remove the box of condoms displayed beneath their tree.

"They had been placed on the floor with a sign inviting people to "help yourself". A similar message was placed elsewhere in the church by other exhibitors offering sweets.

Young children, who attend the festival in their hundreds, either with schools, nursery groups or parents, would not be able to distinguish between a brightly wrapped condom and a sweet.

It is entirely inappropriate to have sexual aids displayed at a level where young children, below the age of sexuality, have open access to them."


  • What do you think? Should the box be there? Leave a comment here.

















Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 December 2008 4:24 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Sudbury
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Squaddie,

Sudbury 05/12/2008 22:59:34
Firstly i'd like to say, the Condoms, or 'Safe sex packs' are provided by NHS Suffolk, they are not in Bright packaging, but in totally sealed Black Envelopes with the image of a red HIV awareness ribbon on the front, and the text 'HIV Lets Get Talking, understanding through communication' and then in the bottom corner has 'Suffolk NHS Primary Care Trust'. They are not just cheap condoms which someone has thrown together themselves. They certainly are not inviting to children. Also what kind of Parent or supervisor allows children to pick things up and open them, without checking what they are doing. These packs are so securely sealed it is difficult for an adult to open them, never mind a child.
The next thing is that the report mentions a sign offering sweets from a tin to children. Surely this is even more dangerous, as who knows what could have been put in the tin by a malicious visitor to such an event or maybe the sweets contain 'NUTS', which is not a good idea if a child with a nut allergy picks one up when not being supervised by and adult, the same way as they would pick up an unidentifiable black envelope with a harmless condom (which, by the way could have saved someone from contracting a disease or prevented unwanted pregnancy, maybe someone who otherwise would not have felt comfortable going to buy condoms in a shop, or been able to afford them) Surely offering the chance to protect somebody is more important than the possible danger of sending a child into anaphalatic shock and maybe death???? Make up your own mind.
Also, Valerie Goodchild obviously hasn't even seen the Safe sex packages in question so her comment has either been fabricated or is just complete nonsense, as the condoms, are not obviously condoms and they certainly are not brightly wrapped, so i would like to know where she got her opinion from, as it certainly wasn't from the Black envelopes that were presented. And as for a condom being a 'Sexual Aid', i don't know how she
2

Squaddie,

sudbury 05/12/2008 23:10:46
I don't know how she came to that conclusion as a condom is certainly not a 'Sexual Aid' but a prophelactic which the definition of is:-
Definition: Prophylactic means preventative, or to prevent.

In medicine, the term prophylactic is used to describe surgeries, dental cleanings, vaccines, birth control and many other types of procedures and treatments that prevent something from happening.

A prophylactic hepatitis vaccine prevents the patient from getting hepatitis, while a prophylactic dental cleaning prevents tooth decay.

So how could this be offensive to anyone, trying to prevent such things.
Other countries in Europe teach Sex Education from Primary School and have much lower rates of STIs, HIV and unwanted pregnancies than Britain which has the highest in Europe.
Britain is stuck in the dark ages, and Sudbury, it seems a few Milleniums behind that. WAKE UP!
3

Valerie Goodchild,

Sudbury 10/12/2008 14:07:12
Firstly, may I congratulate Joan Garden and her band of volunteers for once again providing such a splendid start to the festive season in Sudbury with the annual Christmas Tree festival at St Peter’s.
It was, as ever, a feast for the eyes and ears, thanks to all the musicians who gave of their time, including Free Press journalist Barbara Eeles. All those who contributed to the festival by decorating a tree deserve praise for their efforts. It is therefore most unfortunate that this superb community event, so popular with families from near and far, had to be tainted with an unseemly dispute about the appropriateness of displaying a box of condoms and lubricants in a position where they were within easy access of the many young visitors to the festival.
The Fightback Trust had used their tree to promote a valuable lesson about safer sex, and I have no quarrel with that. However, putting condoms on display with a “help yourself” message at an event attended by pre-school children is inappropriate and, in my view, deliberately provocative. Condoms are items that have a very proper place in the world of adult sexuality, but not in the world of under fives.
As a grandparent, I would have been deeply offended if one of my young granddaughters had picked up a wrapped condom – albeit in a black package decorated with red ribbons. Had they done so, they would naturally have wanted to know what was inside, just as they would if they picked up a wrapped sweet or present. Children of that age don’t differentiate between one sort of wrapped package and another.
Could I suggest to Fightback Trust that their safer sex message would be more usefully promoted at the Sudbury on Show event to be held at St Peter’s and the Town Hall early in 2009. This event is targeted at an adult – or young adult - audience. That would be an appropriate time and place to promote the anti-HIV message, whereas the Christmas Tree festival, aimed at families with children, is the place to promote
4

Valerie Goodchild,

Sudbury 10/12/2008 15:38:45
Sudbury on Show is targeted at an adult – or young adult - audience. That would be an appropriate time and place to promote the anti-HIV message, whereas the Christmas Tree festival, aimed at families with children, is the place to promote the joy of Christmas and its Christian traditions.
Perhaps, with the benefit of hindsight, the organisers should not have allowed any of the exhibitors at the Christmas Tree festival to have anything on display, or offer, other than literature. That would then have removed any danger of people with nut allergies being affected by the ingredients in sweets, or the possibility of a puncture wound from pins on campaign ribbons such as those for Breast Cancer, Domestic Abuse or Aids, and any offence caused by the offer of items such as condoms.



5

Squaddie,

21/12/2008 10:31:17
I think Valerie has made a very concise and educated comment, and also congratulate Joan Garden and her team for a fantastic event. It was beautiful. However, regarding Valeries comment - 'That would be an appropriate time and place to promote the anti-HIV message, whereas the Christmas Tree festival, aimed at families with children, is the place to promote the joy of Christmas and its Christian traditions.' What does an Estate Agent, or Amnesty, or a Beauty Salon, Domestic Abuse, Health food shop, Carpet shop, or Doctors Surgery, have to do with 'the joy of Christmas and its Christian traditions.' So this, i'm afraid is not a valid point. There were no rules for this Christmas tree festival and it is used as an advertising tool to promote businesses and local services, of which The Fightback trust is a very important one. I would like to add that the 'Fightback trust' did not organise this tree, but some of the 'Service Users' put it there as a thankyou for all the things the Fightback trust have done to help them. Therefore, the fightback trust can not be 'blamed' for any upset caused. They do fantastic work to help hundreds of people in this area. As for Condoms being inappropriate, it is only 'Dirty minds' that make things like condoms 'Dirty'. They are here to save lives and help people, as are many of the other organisations who present a tree at the festival. You cannot single out one organisation because you personally do not agree with it. This is Discrimination. With Many Christmas parties happening, and much alcohol being consumed, this is a perfect time to promote 'safe sex', otherwise afterwards, it is too late to say, 'Oh dear! what if???'
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.