Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Suffolk Free Press site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

AFC 2, Dartford 2 - Match report



View Video
Download Video

Video

Pictures from AFC v Dartford
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 February 2008
A highly controversial equalising goal earned leaders Dartford a share of the spoils in this top-of-the-table clash at King's Marsh Stadium on Saturday.
It means that the Kent side remain five points clear in Ryman League division one north, although AFC have a match in hand.

Despite the controversy over Dartford's equaliser a draw was just about a fair result from a pulsating contest played in a good spirit in front of 738 fans, a league record for the stadium.

With over 300 of them Dartford fans – the club regularly attract sfour-figure gates at home games – there was a teriffic atmosphere.

AFC skipper David Head moved into a central defensive role, replacing the injured Kevin Hughes, while Brett Girling and Matty Clements both returned from injury.

Dartford were at full strength, which meant that league's top two goal scorers were on show, Dartford's Brendan Cass with 24 to his name going into the match and James Rowe for the home side who was four behind.

Rowe was one of AFC's many heroes, netting both his team's goals, while Cass was the scorer of Dartford's controversial equaliser.

Weatherwise it was a perfect afternoon, but the King's Marsh pitch was not at its best having failed to recover from being played upon in very wet conditions three weeks earlier.

Despite this both teams served up plenty of entertaining football with the result in doubt until the final whistle.

Dartford kicked off with a bright sun in their faces and they had the best of the early exchanges, although neither side threatened until the visitors forced three corners in quick succession after 18 minutes.

These were well flighted and tested the home defence to the full, with the dangerous Cass a constant threat although in the main he was well marked.

Dartford opened the scoring in the 23rd minute after Stuart Boardley was adjudged to have fouled in the centre circle.

It looked a harsh decision and the resulting free kick was floated high into the AFC penalty area, where Dartford's tall central defender John Guest just got enough on the ball to divert it into the net past Dean Neil who was rooted to his line. It was a soft goal to concede.

The Dartford lead lasted a mere seven minutes. Several promising AFC attacks had broken down at the vital time, but on the half-hour a quick counter-attack was finished off superbly by Rowe, who got between two defenders to beat Tony Kessell with a fine finish.

Dartford replied by winning another corner, but that was easily dealt with before AFC enjoyed a good spell of pressure. Clements forced Kessell to save at the expense of a right-wing corner, and from it AFC took a 2-1 lead.

The Dartford keeper failed to hold the corner under pressure, and the ball dropped to Rowe who, despite having his back to goal, found the roof of the net with a superb overhead kick.

Dartford responded with a series of attacks that saw Junior Kadi hook wide from a good position, and a last-ditch tackle by Sheridan Driver robbed Paul Williams as he was about to let fly.

The full article contains 539 words and appears in Suffolk Free Press newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 19 February 2008 3:14 PM
  • Source: Suffolk Free Press
  • Location: Sudbury
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.